[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111108182728.GR4954@shiny>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:27:28 -0500
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Dan Merillat <dan.merillat@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull request
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 12:55:40PM -0500, Dan Merillat wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com> wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > This pull request is pretty beefy, it ended up merging a number of long
> > running projects and cleanup queues. I've got btrfs patches in the new
> > kernel.org btrfs repo. There are two different branches with the same
> > changes. for-linus is against 3.1 and has also been tested against
> > Linus' tree as of yesterday.
>
> [91795.123286] device label ROOT devid 1 transid 3331 /dev/sdi2
> [91795.123538] btrfs: open_ctree failed
>
> FS created on 3.1 (x64), mounted once on 3.2-rc1 (i386), got that
> whenI tried to mount on 3.1 (x64) again. Format change in 3.2 or
> 32/64 bit compatibility issues?
I'm trying to reproduce right now but I did many bounces between 3.2 and
3.1 code before releasing. I didn't try jumping between 32 and 64 bit.
Are there any other messages in dmesg? Could you please see what
btrfs-debug-tree says?
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists