[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1320786914-10541-4-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 16:15:14 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, jeremy@...p.org, hpa@...or.com, bp@...en8.de,
tj@...nel.org, trenn@...e.de
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] x86/paravirt: Use pte_val instead of pte_flags on CPA pageattr_test
For details refer to patch "x86/paravirt: Use pte_attrs instead of
pte_flags on CPA/set_p.._wb/wc operations." which explains that
some pages have the _PAGE_PWT bit set in the _PAGE_PSE field
when running under Xen.
When pageattr_test is running it uses pte_flags to check whether
it succedded in setting _PAGE_UNUSED1 bit, but also whether the
page had _PAGE_PSE. This can happen when one of the randomly selected
pages to be tested is a page that has been set to be _PAGE_WC
as under Xen, that field is under _PAGE_PSE. Since the 'pte_huge'
call is using the pte_flags(x) macro, which extracts the "raw" contents
of the PTE, the translation of _PAGE_PSE -> _PAGE_PWT does not happen
and we incorrectly identify the PTE as bad.
Using the 'pte_val' instead of 'pte_flags' fixes the problem and
this patch does that.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: stable@...nel.org
---
arch/x86/mm/pageattr-test.c | 6 +++++-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr-test.c b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr-test.c
index b008656..da853e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pageattr-test.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pageattr-test.c
@@ -38,6 +38,10 @@ static int pte_testbit(pte_t pte)
{
return pte_flags(pte) & _PAGE_UNUSED1;
}
+static int pte_testhuge(pte_t pte)
+{
+ return pte_val(pte) & _PAGE_PSE;
+}
struct split_state {
long lpg, gpg, spg, exec;
@@ -180,7 +184,7 @@ static int pageattr_test(void)
}
pte = lookup_address(addr[i], &level);
- if (!pte || !pte_testbit(*pte) || pte_huge(*pte)) {
+ if (!pte || !pte_testbit(*pte) || pte_testhuge(*pte)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "CPA %lx: bad pte %Lx\n", addr[i],
pte ? (u64)pte_val(*pte) : 0ULL);
failed++;
--
1.7.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists