| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1320787408-22866-3-git-send-email-jweiner@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 22:23:20 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch 02/10] mm: vmscan: distinguish global reclaim from global LRU scanning
The traditional zone reclaim code is scanning the per-zone LRU lists
during direct reclaim and kswapd, and the per-zone per-memory cgroup
LRU lists when reclaiming on behalf of a memory cgroup limit.
Subsequent patches will convert the traditional reclaim code to
reclaim exclusively from the per-memory cgroup LRU lists. As a
result, using the predicate for which LRU list is scanned will no
longer be appropriate to tell global reclaim from limit reclaim.
This patch adds a global_reclaim() predicate to tell direct/kswapd
reclaim from memory cgroup limit reclaim and substitutes it in all
places where currently scanning_global_lru() is used for that.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index a1893c0..189597e 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -153,9 +153,25 @@ static LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
-#define scanning_global_lru(sc) (!(sc)->mem_cgroup)
+static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return !sc->mem_cgroup;
+}
+
+static bool scanning_global_lru(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return !sc->mem_cgroup;
+}
#else
-#define scanning_global_lru(sc) (1)
+static bool global_reclaim(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+
+static bool scanning_global_lru(struct scan_control *sc)
+{
+ return true;
+}
#endif
static struct zone_reclaim_stat *get_reclaim_stat(struct zone *zone,
@@ -1006,7 +1022,7 @@ keep_lumpy:
* back off and wait for congestion to clear because further reclaim
* will encounter the same problem
*/
- if (nr_dirty && nr_dirty == nr_congested && scanning_global_lru(sc))
+ if (nr_dirty && nr_dirty == nr_congested && global_reclaim(sc))
zone_set_flag(zone, ZONE_CONGESTED);
free_page_list(&free_pages);
@@ -1325,7 +1341,7 @@ static int too_many_isolated(struct zone *zone, int file,
if (current_is_kswapd())
return 0;
- if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
+ if (!global_reclaim(sc))
return 0;
if (file) {
@@ -1503,6 +1519,12 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct zone *zone,
if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
nr_taken = isolate_pages_global(nr_to_scan, &page_list,
&nr_scanned, sc->order, reclaim_mode, zone, 0, file);
+ } else {
+ nr_taken = mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(nr_to_scan, &page_list,
+ &nr_scanned, sc->order, reclaim_mode, zone,
+ sc->mem_cgroup, 0, file);
+ }
+ if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
zone->pages_scanned += nr_scanned;
if (current_is_kswapd())
__count_zone_vm_events(PGSCAN_KSWAPD, zone,
@@ -1510,14 +1532,6 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to_scan, struct zone *zone,
else
__count_zone_vm_events(PGSCAN_DIRECT, zone,
nr_scanned);
- } else {
- nr_taken = mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(nr_to_scan, &page_list,
- &nr_scanned, sc->order, reclaim_mode, zone,
- sc->mem_cgroup, 0, file);
- /*
- * mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
- * scanned pages on its own.
- */
}
if (nr_taken == 0) {
@@ -1658,18 +1672,16 @@ static void shrink_active_list(unsigned long nr_pages, struct zone *zone,
&pgscanned, sc->order,
reclaim_mode, zone,
1, file);
- zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
} else {
nr_taken = mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(nr_pages, &l_hold,
&pgscanned, sc->order,
reclaim_mode, zone,
sc->mem_cgroup, 1, file);
- /*
- * mem_cgroup_isolate_pages() keeps track of
- * scanned pages on its own.
- */
}
+ if (global_reclaim(sc))
+ zone->pages_scanned += pgscanned;
+
reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[file] += nr_taken;
__count_zone_vm_events(PGREFILL, zone, pgscanned);
@@ -1839,7 +1851,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_list(enum lru_list lru, unsigned long nr_to_scan,
static int vmscan_swappiness(struct scan_control *sc)
{
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
+ if (global_reclaim(sc))
return vm_swappiness;
return mem_cgroup_swappiness(sc->mem_cgroup);
}
@@ -1874,9 +1886,9 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
* latencies, so it's better to scan a minimum amount there as
* well.
*/
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && current_is_kswapd())
+ if (current_is_kswapd())
force_scan = true;
- if (!scanning_global_lru(sc))
+ if (!global_reclaim(sc))
force_scan = true;
/* If we have no swap space, do not bother scanning anon pages. */
@@ -1893,7 +1905,7 @@ static void get_scan_count(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
file = zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_ACTIVE_FILE) +
zone_nr_lru_pages(zone, sc, LRU_INACTIVE_FILE);
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
+ if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
free = zone_page_state(zone, NR_FREE_PAGES);
/* If we have very few page cache pages,
force-scan anon pages. */
@@ -2125,7 +2137,7 @@ static bool shrink_zones(int priority, struct zonelist *zonelist,
* Take care memory controller reclaiming has small influence
* to global LRU.
*/
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
+ if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
continue;
if (zone->all_unreclaimable && priority != DEF_PRIORITY)
@@ -2223,7 +2235,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
get_mems_allowed();
delayacct_freepages_start();
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc))
+ if (global_reclaim(sc))
count_vm_event(ALLOCSTALL);
for (priority = DEF_PRIORITY; priority >= 0; priority--) {
@@ -2237,7 +2249,7 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
* Don't shrink slabs when reclaiming memory from
* over limit cgroups
*/
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc)) {
+ if (global_reclaim(sc)) {
unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist,
gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask)) {
@@ -2299,7 +2311,7 @@ out:
return 0;
/* top priority shrink_zones still had more to do? don't OOM, then */
- if (scanning_global_lru(sc) && !all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc))
+ if (global_reclaim(sc) && !all_unreclaimable(zonelist, sc))
return 1;
return 0;
--
1.7.6.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists