[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111108213148.GA4504@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 23:31:50 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: virtio-pci new configuration proposal
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 08:51:38PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2011 08:32:50 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:23:33AM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > > Even so, should we just use the PCI cap list, and have each
> > > cap entry just contain a BIR & offset?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Rusty.
> >
> > And size :)
> > I say, Rusty, did you see my patch? That's what it's doing,
> > I also addressed the issue that with KVM on x86, PIO is faster
> > than MMIO so we need to use it for notifications/isr.
>
> Faster? Really? Why?
I think, because it doesn't need to be emulated to get the address
and the value. There are so many ways on x86 to do memory
access, you need a lot of code to figure out what's going on.
> Were the ppc guys right that's it's obsolescent?
For PCI - surely not. PCI Express spec tries to discourage its usage.
But support is there even in Express.
> Because PIO is going to be ugly AFAICT for every non-x86 platform.
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.
>
So we should make the BAR MMIO on non-x86 host, PIO on x86.
Guest should just map and use what it's given.
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists