linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111109101114.GA20506@infradead.org>
Date:	Wed, 9 Nov 2011 05:11:14 -0500
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Arne Jansen <sensille@....net>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
	Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@...il.com>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull request

On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:06:55AM +0100, Arne Jansen wrote:
> That's... unexpected. I guess this won't change with 3.3? For 3.3 I have
> to rework that part from scrub to account for Chris' bigblocks. If it can
> wait that long I'd prefer to fix both at once. Chris?

device mapper has always been like that.  It makes splitting requests
over multiple targets a lot easier for them.  With increasin I/O sizes
that is something which will have to be fixed sooner or later, though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/