[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111109170657.GE1260@google.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:06:57 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...e.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thp: reduce khugepaged freezing latency
Hello,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:59:25AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Freezer depends on the usual "set_current_state(INTERRUPTIBLE); check
> freezing; schedule(); check freezing" construct and sends
> INTERRUPTIBLE wake up after setting freezing state. The
> synchronization hasn't been completely clear but recently been cleaned
> up, so as long as freezing condition is tested after INTERRUPTIBLE is
> set before going to sleep, the event won't go missing.
>
> Maybe we need a helper here, which would be named horribly -
> schedule_timeout_interruptible_freezable(). (cc'ing Oleg) Oleg, maybe
> we need schedule_timeout(@sleep_type) too?
Ah, crap, still waking up. Sorry about that. So, yes, there's a race
condition above. You need to set TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before testing
freezing and use schedule_timeout() instead of
schedule_timeout_interruptible(). Was getting confused with
prepare_to_wait(). That said, why not use prepare_to_wait() instead?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists