[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLGOhW3tLTCZZw3VKoxd4Cg8ZN66ACj1vW3yQAFRenm3-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 21:19:46 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] slab: rename slab_break_gfp_order to slab_max_order
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011, David Rientjes wrote:
>> slab_break_gfp_order is more appropriately named slab_max_order since it
>> enforces the maximum order size of slabs as long as a single object will
>> still fit.
>>
>> Also rename BREAK_GFP_ORDER_{LO,HI} accordingly.
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 11:40 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> Ping on these two patches? I don't see them in slab/next.
The patches seem reasonable to me. Christoph?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists