linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: incorrect build fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111109173722.a7f4c7d65c13bcb80bf2e6ba@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:37:22 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Cc:	'Kyungmin Park' <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, 'LKML' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: incorrect build fix

Hi,

On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:11:50 +0900 Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure following......
> So only for THIS_MODULE, <linux/export.h> should be added instead of
> <linux/module.h>?

Yes, that is correct.   It means that much less code is included.  If
replacing module.h with export.h causes other build errors, they should
be fixed by including the correct files directly (module.h include a lot
of other include files).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped