[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1111101638550.3307@xanadu.home>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 16:53:53 -0500 (EST)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/16] ARM: LPAE: Introduce the 3-level page table
format definitions
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> This patch introduces the pgtable-3level*.h files with definitions
> specific to the LPAE page table format (3 levels of page tables).
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level-hwdef.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level-hwdef.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..7c238a3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level-hwdef.h
[...]
> +#ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
> +/* avoid 'shift count out of range' warning */
> +#define PMD_SECT_XN (0)
> +#else
> +#define PMD_SECT_XN ((pmdval_t)1 << 54)
> +#endif
Please don't do that. Having a symbol that changes value depending on
the type of code is evil. If PMD_SECT_XN is actually used in assembly
code then you have to deal with it, not blindly redefine it as zero.
In my compilation test I didn't see any such warning anyway.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level-types.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level-types.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..921aa30
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level-types.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
[...]
> +typedef u64 pteval_t;
> +typedef u64 pmdval_t;
> +typedef u64 pgdval_t;
> +
> +#undef STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS
> +
> +#ifdef STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS
> +
> +/*
> + * These are used to make use of C type-checking..
> + */
> +typedef struct { pteval_t pte; } pte_t;
> +typedef struct { pmdval_t pmd; } pmd_t;
> +typedef struct { pgdval_t pgd; } pgd_t;
> +typedef struct { pteval_t pgprot; } pgprot_t;
> +
> +#define pte_val(x) ((x).pte)
> +#define pmd_val(x) ((x).pmd)
> +#define pgd_val(x) ((x).pgd)
> +#define pgprot_val(x) ((x).pgprot)
> +
> +#define __pte(x) ((pte_t) { (x) } )
> +#define __pmd(x) ((pmd_t) { (x) } )
> +#define __pgd(x) ((pgd_t) { (x) } )
> +#define __pgprot(x) ((pgprot_t) { (x) } )
> +
> +#else /* !STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS */
> +
> +typedef pteval_t pte_t;
> +typedef pmdval_t pmd_t;
> +typedef pgdval_t pgd_t;
> +typedef pteval_t pgprot_t;
> +
> +#define pte_val(x) (x)
> +#define pmd_val(x) (x)
> +#define pgd_val(x) (x)
> +#define pgprot_val(x) (x)
> +
> +#define __pte(x) (x)
> +#define __pmd(x) (x)
> +#define __pgd(x) (x)
> +#define __pgprot(x) (x)
> +
> +#endif /* STRICT_MM_TYPECHECKS */
Isn't the vast majority of this file actually common with the content of
pgtable-2level-types.h? Except for the basic types and pgd handling,
this looks pretty similar.
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists