[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111109213145.436353890@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:31:20 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: [033/264] [SCSI] isci: fix support for large smp requests
3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
commit 54b5e3a4bfa3452bc10cd4da672099ccc46b8c09 upstream.
Kill the local smp response buffer.
Besides being unnecessary, it is too small (currently truncates
responses to 60 bytes). The mid-layer will have already allocated a
sufficiently sized buffer, just kmap and copy into it directly.
Reported-by: Derick Marks <derick.w.marks@...el.com>
Tested-by: Derick Marks <derick.w.marks@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <JBottomley@...allels.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
drivers/scsi/isci/isci.h | 2 -
drivers/scsi/isci/request.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++---------------------------
drivers/scsi/isci/request.h | 3 --
drivers/scsi/isci/sas.h | 2 -
4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/isci.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/isci.h
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
#define SCU_MAX_COMPLETION_QUEUE_SHIFT (ilog2(SCU_MAX_COMPLETION_QUEUE_ENTRIES))
#define SCU_ABSOLUTE_MAX_UNSOLICITED_FRAMES (4096)
-#define SCU_UNSOLICITED_FRAME_BUFFER_SIZE (1024)
+#define SCU_UNSOLICITED_FRAME_BUFFER_SIZE (1024U)
#define SCU_INVALID_FRAME_INDEX (0xFFFF)
#define SCU_IO_REQUEST_MAX_SGE_SIZE (0x00FFFFFF)
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.c
@@ -1490,29 +1490,30 @@ sci_io_request_frame_handler(struct isci
return SCI_SUCCESS;
case SCI_REQ_SMP_WAIT_RESP: {
- struct smp_resp *rsp_hdr = &ireq->smp.rsp;
- void *frame_header;
+ struct sas_task *task = isci_request_access_task(ireq);
+ struct scatterlist *sg = &task->smp_task.smp_resp;
+ void *frame_header, *kaddr;
+ u8 *rsp;
sci_unsolicited_frame_control_get_header(&ihost->uf_control,
- frame_index,
- &frame_header);
-
- /* byte swap the header. */
- word_cnt = SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ / sizeof(u32);
- sci_swab32_cpy(rsp_hdr, frame_header, word_cnt);
+ frame_index,
+ &frame_header);
+ kaddr = kmap_atomic(sg_page(sg), KM_IRQ0);
+ rsp = kaddr + sg->offset;
+ sci_swab32_cpy(rsp, frame_header, 1);
- if (rsp_hdr->frame_type == SMP_RESPONSE) {
+ if (rsp[0] == SMP_RESPONSE) {
void *smp_resp;
sci_unsolicited_frame_control_get_buffer(&ihost->uf_control,
- frame_index,
- &smp_resp);
-
- word_cnt = (sizeof(struct smp_resp) - SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ) /
- sizeof(u32);
+ frame_index,
+ &smp_resp);
- sci_swab32_cpy(((u8 *) rsp_hdr) + SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ,
- smp_resp, word_cnt);
+ word_cnt = (sg->length/4)-1;
+ if (word_cnt > 0)
+ word_cnt = min_t(unsigned int, word_cnt,
+ SCU_UNSOLICITED_FRAME_BUFFER_SIZE/4);
+ sci_swab32_cpy(rsp + 4, smp_resp, word_cnt);
ireq->scu_status = SCU_TASK_DONE_GOOD;
ireq->sci_status = SCI_SUCCESS;
@@ -1528,12 +1529,13 @@ sci_io_request_frame_handler(struct isci
__func__,
ireq,
frame_index,
- rsp_hdr->frame_type);
+ rsp[0]);
ireq->scu_status = SCU_TASK_DONE_SMP_FRM_TYPE_ERR;
ireq->sci_status = SCI_FAILURE_CONTROLLER_SPECIFIC_IO_ERR;
sci_change_state(&ireq->sm, SCI_REQ_COMPLETED);
}
+ kunmap_atomic(kaddr, KM_IRQ0);
sci_controller_release_frame(ihost, frame_index);
@@ -2603,18 +2605,7 @@ static void isci_request_io_request_comp
status = SAM_STAT_GOOD;
set_bit(IREQ_COMPLETE_IN_TARGET, &request->flags);
- if (task->task_proto == SAS_PROTOCOL_SMP) {
- void *rsp = &request->smp.rsp;
-
- dev_dbg(&ihost->pdev->dev,
- "%s: SMP protocol completion\n",
- __func__);
-
- sg_copy_from_buffer(
- &task->smp_task.smp_resp, 1,
- rsp, sizeof(struct smp_resp));
- } else if (completion_status
- == SCI_IO_SUCCESS_IO_DONE_EARLY) {
+ if (completion_status == SCI_IO_SUCCESS_IO_DONE_EARLY) {
/* This was an SSP / STP / SATA transfer.
* There is a possibility that less data than
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/request.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/request.h
@@ -174,9 +174,6 @@ struct isci_request {
};
} ssp;
struct {
- struct smp_resp rsp;
- } smp;
- struct {
struct isci_stp_request req;
struct host_to_dev_fis cmd;
struct dev_to_host_fis rsp;
--- a/drivers/scsi/isci/sas.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/isci/sas.h
@@ -204,8 +204,6 @@ struct smp_req {
u8 req_data[0];
} __packed;
-#define SMP_RESP_HDR_SZ 4
-
/*
* struct sci_sas_address - This structure depicts how a SAS address is
* represented by SCI.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists