[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111109213151.629122046@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:32:22 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: [095/264] Revert "NFS: Ensure that writeback_single_inode() calls write_inode() when syncing"
3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
commit 59b7c05fffba030e5d9e72324691e2f99aa69b79 upstream.
This reverts commit b80c3cb628f0ebc241b02e38dd028969fb8026a2.
The reverted commit was rendered obsolete by a VFS fix: commit
5547e8aac6f71505d621a612de2fca0dd988b439 (writeback: Update dirty flags in
two steps). We now no longer need to worry about writeback_single_inode()
missing our marking the inode for COMMIT in 'do_writepages()' call.
Reverting this patch, fixes a performance regression in which the inode
would continuously get queued to the dirty list, causing the writeback
code to unnecessarily try to send a COMMIT.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Tested-by: Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/nfs/write.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -428,7 +428,6 @@ static void
nfs_mark_request_dirty(struct nfs_page *req)
{
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers(req->wb_page);
- __mark_inode_dirty(req->wb_page->mapping->host, I_DIRTY_DATASYNC);
}
#if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V3) || defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4)
@@ -762,6 +761,8 @@ int nfs_updatepage(struct file *file, st
status = nfs_writepage_setup(ctx, page, offset, count);
if (status < 0)
nfs_set_pageerror(page);
+ else
+ __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
dprintk("NFS: nfs_updatepage returns %d (isize %lld)\n",
status, (long long)i_size_read(inode));
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists