[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111109213205.648847340@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:34:37 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [230/264] blk-flush: move the queue kick into
3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
commit e67b77c791ca2778198c9e7088f3266ed2da7a55 upstream.
A dm-multipath user reported[1] a problem when trying to boot
a kernel with commit 4853abaae7e4a2af938115ce9071ef8684fb7af4
(block: fix flush machinery for stacking drivers with differring
flush flags) applied. It turns out that an empty flush request
can be sent into blk_insert_flush. When the BUG_ON was fixed
to allow for this, I/O on the underlying device would stall. The
reason is that blk_insert_cloned_request does not kick the queue.
In the aforementioned commit, I had added a special case to
kick the queue if data was sent down but the queue flags did
not require a flush. A better solution is to push the queue
kick up into blk_insert_cloned_request.
This patch, along with a follow-on which fixes the BUG_ON, fixes
the issue reported.
[1] http://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2011-September/msg00154.html
Reported-by: Christophe Saout <christophe@...ut.de>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
block/blk-core.c | 2 ++
block/blk-flush.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1725,6 +1725,8 @@ int blk_insert_cloned_request(struct req
where = ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH;
add_acct_request(q, rq, where);
+ if (where == ELEVATOR_INSERT_FLUSH)
+ __blk_run_queue(q);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
return 0;
--- a/block/blk-flush.c
+++ b/block/blk-flush.c
@@ -330,7 +330,6 @@ void blk_insert_flush(struct request *rq
if ((policy & REQ_FSEQ_DATA) &&
!(policy & (REQ_FSEQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_FSEQ_POSTFLUSH))) {
list_add_tail(&rq->queuelist, &q->queue_head);
- blk_run_queue_async(q);
return;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists