[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111109213159.212094162@clark.kroah.org>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:33:36 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>,
"Theodore Tso" <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [169/264] ext4: ext4_rename should dirty dir_bh with the correct directory
3.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...ibm.com>
commit bcaa992975041e40449be8c010c26192b8c8b409 upstream.
When ext4_rename performs a directory rename (move), dir_bh is a
buffer that is modified to update the '..' link in the directory being
moved (old_inode). However, ext4_handle_dirty_metadata is called with
the old parent directory inode (old_dir) and dir_bh, which is
incorrect because dir_bh does not belong to the parent inode. Fix
this error.
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
fs/ext4/namei.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -2530,7 +2530,7 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct inode *old
PARENT_INO(dir_bh->b_data, new_dir->i_sb->s_blocksize) =
cpu_to_le32(new_dir->i_ino);
BUFFER_TRACE(dir_bh, "call ext4_handle_dirty_metadata");
- retval = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, old_dir, dir_bh);
+ retval = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, old_inode, dir_bh);
if (retval) {
ext4_std_error(old_dir->i_sb, retval);
goto end_rename;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists