linux-kernel - [019/264] xhci-mem.c: Check for ring->first

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111109213144.023670297@clark.kroah.org>
Date:	Wed, 09 Nov 2011 13:31:06 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>,
	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [019/264] xhci-mem.c: Check for ring->first_seg != NULL

3.1-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>

commit 0e6c7f746ea99089fb3263709075c20485a479ae upstream.

There are 2 situations wherein the xhci_ring* might not get freed:
- When xhci_ring_alloc() -> xhci_segment_alloc() returns NULL and
  we goto the fail: label in xhci_ring_alloc. In this case, the ring
  will not get kfreed.
- When the num_segs argument to xhci_ring_alloc is passed as 0 and
  we try to free the rung after that.
  ( This doesn't really happen as of now in the code but we seem to
    be entertaining num_segs=0 in xhci_ring_alloc )

This should be backported to kernels as old as 2.6.31.

Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c |   22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c
@@ -112,18 +112,20 @@ void xhci_ring_free(struct xhci_hcd *xhc
 	struct xhci_segment *seg;
 	struct xhci_segment *first_seg;
 
-	if (!ring || !ring->first_seg)
+	if (!ring)
 		return;
-	first_seg = ring->first_seg;
-	seg = first_seg->next;
-	xhci_dbg(xhci, "Freeing ring at %p\n", ring);
-	while (seg != first_seg) {
-		struct xhci_segment *next = seg->next;
-		xhci_segment_free(xhci, seg);
-		seg = next;
+	if (ring->first_seg) {
+		first_seg = ring->first_seg;
+		seg = first_seg->next;
+		xhci_dbg(xhci, "Freeing ring at %p\n", ring);
+		while (seg != first_seg) {
+			struct xhci_segment *next = seg->next;
+			xhci_segment_free(xhci, seg);
+			seg = next;
+		}
+		xhci_segment_free(xhci, first_seg);
+		ring->first_seg = NULL;
 	}
-	xhci_segment_free(xhci, first_seg);
-	ring->first_seg = NULL;
 	kfree(ring);
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/