[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF379E7B25.DD8B41D5-ONC1257944.002E2296-C1257944.002E8AB3@transmode.se>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:28:21 +0100
From: Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
To: "Bob Pearson" <rpearson@...temfabricworks.com>
Cc: "'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"'Frank Zago'" <fzago@...temfabricworks.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] crc32: Optimize inner loop.
"Bob Pearson" <rpearson@...temfabricworks.com> wrote on 2011/11/10 06:58:35:
>
> >
> > I meant to ask about that. The discussion was fairly long and complex
> > and I'm now unsure whether the patch I have is a still up-to-date,
> > whether it is a good one, whether it has additional testing results,
> > etc.
>
> The original patch that went into your mm tree was replaced by a cleaner one
> over time but the review process went on and on and I had to spend more time
> with my day job. Eventually I just couldn't figure out how to get everyone
> any happier. I was really reluctant to give up performance on the Intel
> platform
> but we were mostly arguing about 2-3% give or take.
As I recall I was happy with your last round(possibly some minor nits) and
you were going to submit a final round to be included by Andrew.
>
> It seems that the folks that wanted the same algorithm for crc32c may have
> figured out how to reach a compromise.
crc32c are based on your patches and can't move on until your work
is applied.
Jocke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists