lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OF379E7B25.DD8B41D5-ONC1257944.002E2296-C1257944.002E8AB3@transmode.se>
Date:	Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:28:21 +0100
From:	Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund@...nsmode.se>
To:	"Bob Pearson" <rpearson@...temfabricworks.com>
Cc:	"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"'Frank Zago'" <fzago@...temfabricworks.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] crc32: Optimize inner loop.

"Bob Pearson" <rpearson@...temfabricworks.com> wrote on 2011/11/10 06:58:35:
>
> >
> > I meant to ask about that.  The discussion was fairly long and complex
> > and I'm now unsure whether the patch I have is a still up-to-date,
> > whether it is a good one, whether it has additional testing results,
> > etc.
>
> The original patch that went into your mm tree was replaced by a cleaner one
> over time but the review process went on and on and I had to spend more time
> with my day job. Eventually I just couldn't figure out how to get everyone
> any happier. I was really reluctant to give up performance on the Intel
> platform
> but we were mostly arguing about 2-3% give or take.

As I recall I was happy with your last round(possibly some minor nits) and
you were going to submit a final round to be included by Andrew.

>
> It seems that the folks that wanted the same algorithm for crc32c may have
> figured out how to reach a compromise.

crc32c are based on your patches and can't move on until your work
is applied.

 Jocke

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ