[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3937191C-A735-4668-8E80-9FB4B35E2F63@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 07:40:04 -0600
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett@...ing.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
Timur Tabi <B04825@...escale.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/17] powerpc/e500: Remove conditional "lwsync" substitution
On Nov 9, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> As FreeScale e500 systems have different cacheline sizes from e500mc, it
> is basically impossible for the kernel to support both in a single
> system image at present.
>
> Given that one is SPE-float and the other is classic-float, they are not
> generally userspace-compatible either.
>
> This patch updates the conditional to depend on whether the system is
> actually targetting an "e500" or "e500mc" core and entirely removes the
> unused sync-to-lwsync-replacement on e500v1/e500v2 systems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kyle Moffett <Kyle.D.Moffett@...ing.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/synch.h | 16 ++++------------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Nak, we can run an e500mc in a mode that is compatible with e500v1/v2. I see no reason to change the support we have there.
- k--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists