[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111110135703.GA23609@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:57:03 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c)
* Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
> On 10/11/2011 01:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 10/11/11 02:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> The linux-next tree is now available from
> >> git://github.com/sfrothwell/linux-next.git as a temporary measure while
> >> the kernel.org servers are unavailable.
> >>
> >> It may also turn up on git.kernel.org (depending on the mirroring). The
> >> patch set is still absent, however.
> >>
> >> Changes since 20111007:
> >>
> >> Removed tree: ide (at the maintainer's request)
> >
> >
> > drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c:55:13: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
>
> [adding Author: Anton]
>
> Build error still present in linux-next of 20111014.
This build failure regression report was ignored twice and then
pushed upstream and is still unfixed a month after the initial
report. Upstream now fails to build on like 25% of x86 configs.
What's going on with this bug guys?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists