[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVT_z++a9G2H5oCPk8uPiSpfqV_eC=7KA+3nedgaNHz7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 22:17:42 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
schwidefsky@...ibm.com, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kdump: Fix crash_kexec - smp_send_stop race in panic
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Ho hum, I guess we stick with the original patch. It *should* work, as
> long as all archtectures are doing the expected thing. But in this
> situation it is bad of us to just hope that the architectures are doing
> this. We should go and find out, rather than waiting for bug reports
> to come in. Especially because in this case, bugs will take a very
> long time indeed to even be noticed.
>
> One way to resolve this would be to ask the various arch maintainers!
At least we can add the spin_lock just for x86 and s390, and leave
a big comment saying we are waiting for the other arch to be fixed...
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists