| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20111110151548.GA8557@comet.deepsky.org> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 00:15:48 +0900 From: Jérôme Pinot <ngc891@...il.com> To: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Evolution of kernel size On 11/10/11 09:59, Nick Bowler wrote: > On 2011-11-10 23:33 +0900, Jérôme Pinot wrote: > > I took some time to make a graph of the evolution of the size of the > > linux kernel tar.bz2 since version 1.0 till 3.1 (297 releases). > > It doesn't count the stable branches (2.6.x.y). > > > > Impressive, it's mostly exponential. > > If dev keeps same pace, we should break the 100MB at > > linux 3.19. > > > > You can get the graph on my blog, I provide the data and the > > gnuplot batch file for graphing/fitting: > > http://ngc891.blogdns.net/?p=92 > > > > It may interest some people :-) > > What scale did you use for the horizontal axis? I see numbers assigned > to each version in your gnuplot file, but no indication of how you came > up with them. It's just the release count, one step for one release. Some release are missing, mostly at the very beginning, I didn't find tarball for them but it doesn't matter much for the shape of the curve. -- Jérôme Pinot http://ngc891.blogdns.net/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists