[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111110161244.GN3153@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 17:12:44 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...allels.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc 3/3] mm: vmscan: revert file list boost on lru addition
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 11:45:20AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:32:47 +0100
> Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > The idea in 9ff473b 'vmscan: evict streaming IO first' was to steer
> > reclaim focus onto file pages with every new file page that hits the
> > lru list, so that an influx of used-once file pages does not lead to
> > swapping of anonymous pages.
> >
> > The problem is that nobody is fixing up the balance if the pages in
> > fact become part of the resident set.
> >
> > Anonymous page creation is neutral to the inter-lru balance, so even a
> > comparably tiny number of heavily used file pages tip the balance in
> > favor of the file list.
> >
> > In addition, there is no refault detection, and every refault will
> > bias the balance even more. A thrashing file working set will be
> > mistaken for a very lucrative source of reclaimable pages.
> >
> > As anonymous pages are no longer swapped above a certain priority
> > level, this mechanism is no longer needed. Used-once file pages
> > should get reclaimed before the VM even considers swapping.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>
>
> Do you have some results ?
Not yet, sorry, I had to drop it all and do something else.
This change relies on the VM having a different mechanism to go for
one-shot file cache first, so I need to address Kosaki-san's concerns
about 1/3 before pursuing this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists