[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EBC1592.2060307@garzik.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 13:18:58 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@...mvista.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 11 (ata/pata_of_platform.c)
On 11/10/2011 08:57 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
>
>> On 10/11/2011 01:37 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>> On 10/11/11 02:11, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> The linux-next tree is now available from
>>>> git://github.com/sfrothwell/linux-next.git as a temporary measure while
>>>> the kernel.org servers are unavailable.
>>>>
>>>> It may also turn up on git.kernel.org (depending on the mirroring). The
>>>> patch set is still absent, however.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since 20111007:
>>>>
>>>> Removed tree: ide (at the maintainer's request)
>>>
>>>
>>> drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c:55:13: error: 'NO_IRQ' undeclared (first use in this function)
>>
>>
>> [adding Author: Anton]
>>
>> Build error still present in linux-next of 20111014.
>
> This build failure regression report was ignored twice and then
> pushed upstream and is still unfixed a month after the initial
> report. Upstream now fails to build on like 25% of x86 configs.
>
> What's going on with this bug guys?
Hum, I missed it in my LKML scans, and never got a CC.
Will merge Anton's patch immediately...
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists