[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EBC2208.7020102@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:12:08 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] MSM timer fixes and cleanups
On 11/10/11 10:33, David Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 10:34:02AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Currently the MSM timers use the same physical counter
>> for the clockevent and clocksource. This works as long
>> as the clocksource isn't stopped from ticking during normal
>> operation but unfortunately that isn't the case and the
>> clocksource is stopped when the clockevent is shutdown.
>> Even worse, switching the clocksource via sysfs at runtime will
>> hang the system.
>>
>> This series reorganizes the MSM timer code so that one counter
>> is only used for either a clocksource or a clockevent, and not
>> both. In the process we reduce the lines of code and fix
>> a few long-standing bugs.
> How do you test these on the upstream kernel? Booting successfully is
> probably a good starting point, though.
>
Booting is good because that means you're getting timer interrupts.
After that, do some sleep 10, 20, 30, etc. tests with a stopwatch to
make sure that time isn't completely off.
You can also check bogoMIPS and see what the before and after is. Beyond
that I suppose some kind of ntp or gettimeofday test would be good.
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists