[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:18:56 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s3c-adc-battery: Add naive POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT implementation
Am Donnerstag, 10. November 2011, 14:30:52 schrieb Anton Vorontsov:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 02:05:06PM +0300, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote:
> > On Thu, 2011-11-10 at 09:56 +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > > Userspace programs like upower seem to depend on the presence of the
> > > POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT property.
> > >
> > > The real presence of the battery cannot be sensed and all other
> > > routines of s3c-adc-battery simply expect it to be present.
> > >
> > > Therefore we simply return 1, unless the battery struct is not present
> > > at all.
> >
> > Looks OK for me,
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> >
> > Acked-by: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>
>
> I disagree. If the driver behaves like the hardware does not support
> hot-pluggable cells, then present property is not necessary.
>
> Upowerd should look at the 'present' only if it is there; and if it
> is not, cells assumed to be always present.
[..]
> So, the problem is in upowerd, not this driver.
Thanks for your comment. I will therefore take this matter up with the upower-
guys.
Thanks
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists