[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 20:18:19 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Nathan Lynch <ntl@...ox.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serue@...ibm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pids: Make it possible to clone tasks with given
pids
On 11/11/2011 08:10 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> It's highly unlikely that the ability to fork in parallel would
>> contribute to any meaningful speedup. That is not the critical path by
>> *far*
>
> To add a bit, it's also one of the more *serialized* path. Doing it in
> parallel might actually hurt,
Can you elaborate on this, please?
> so if losing the ability to do it makes it less intrusive, that's the
> better way.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists