[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17408058CA@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 14:02:49 -0800
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 09/10] arm/tegra: implement support for tegra30
Peter De Schrijver wrote at Friday, November 11, 2011 4:22 AM:
> Add support for tegra30 SoC. This includes a device tree compatible type for
> this SoC ("nvidia,tegra30") and adds L2 cache initialization for this new SoC.
> The clock framework is still missing, which prevents most drivers from working.
> The basic IRQs are the same, so remove the dependency on
> CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board.h b/arch/arm/mach-tegra/board.h
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
> void __init tegra20_init_early(void);
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_3x_SOC
> +void __init tegra30_init_early(void);
> +#endif
Do we need to ifdef the prototypes? Same comment for Tegra30 here and
Tegra20 in the earlier patch.
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists