| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4EBE4A09.9090007@parallels.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Nov 2011 08:27:21 -0200
From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <paul@...lmenage.org>,
<lizf@...fujitsu.com>, <daniel.lezcano@...e.fr>,
<a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
<fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/14] Move /proc/stat logic inside sched.c
On 11/11/2011 11:35 PM, Paul Turner wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 02:19 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> This patch moves all of the /proc/stat display code inside
>> sched.c. The goal is to later on, have a different version
>> of it per-cgroup. In containers environment, this is useful
>> to give each container a different and independent view of
>> the statistics displayed in this file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa<glommer@...allels.com>
>> ---
>> fs/proc/stat.c | 139 +-----------------------------------------------
>> include/linux/sched.h | 1 +
>> kernel/sched.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
>>
>
> This feels a little contrived. sched.c isn't the right place for much of
> this code. Why do you want to move it all instead of exporting the
> functionality (e.g. remove static?).
Because later on in the series I start using task_group, which is a
scheduler internal data structure (Since the very goal here is achieving
per cgroup data.
It seemed to me better to do this way - as much as I agree with you that
a lot here may not belong in sched.c - than to use external functions.
Since all we have outside sched.c is a task_struct,
we'd have to derive a task_group from it every time. Also,
as you can see in the followup patches, which task_group to use depends
on the caller and possibly some runtime variables. So the computation is
not as trivially fast as just getting a field in a structure.
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
>> index e78e1aa..3f42916 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
>> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
>> #include<linux/ctype.h>
>> #include<linux/ftrace.h>
>> #include<linux/slab.h>
>> +#include<linux/tick.h>
>>
>> #include<asm/tlb.h>
>> #include<asm/irq_regs.h>
>> @@ -9494,6 +9495,147 @@ struct cgroup_subsys cpu_cgroup_subsys = {
>>
>> #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED */
>>
>> +#ifndef fi
>> +#define arch_irq_stat_cpu(cpu) 0
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef arch_irq_stat
>> +#define arch_irq_stat() 0
>> +#endif
>> +#ifndef arch_idle_time
>> +#define arch_idle_time(cpu) 0
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +static u64 get_idle_time(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + u64 idle, idle_time = get_cpu_idle_time_us(cpu, NULL);
>> +
>> + if (idle_time == -1ULL) {
>> + /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.idle */
>> + idle = kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[IDLE];
>> + idle += arch_idle_time(cpu);
>> + } else
>> + idle = usecs_to_cputime(idle_time);
>> +
>> + return idle;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static u64 get_iowait_time(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + u64 iowait, iowait_time = get_cpu_iowait_time_us(cpu, NULL);
>> +
>> + if (iowait_time == -1ULL)
>> + /* !NO_HZ so we can rely on cpustat.iowait */
>> + iowait = kstat_cpu(cpu).cpustat[IOWAIT];
>> + else
>> + iowait = usecs_to_cputime(iowait_time);
>> +
>> + return iowait;
>> +}
>> +
>> +int cpu_cgroup_proc_stat(struct seq_file *p)
>> +{
>> + int i, j;
>> + unsigned long jif;
>> + u64 user, nice, system, idle, iowait, irq, softirq, steal;
>> + u64 guest, guest_nice;
>> + u64 sum = 0;
>> + u64 sum_softirq = 0;
>> + unsigned int per_softirq_sums[NR_SOFTIRQS] = {0};
>> + struct timespec boottime;
>> +
>> + user = nice = system = idle = iowait =
>> + irq = softirq = steal = 0;
>> + guest = guest_nice = 0;
>> + getboottime(&boottime);
>> + jif = boottime.tv_sec;
>> +
>> + for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>> + user += kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[USER];
>> + nice += kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[NICE];
>> + system += kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[SYSTEM];
>> + idle += get_idle_time(i);
>> + iowait += get_iowait_time(i);
>> + irq += kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[IRQ];
>> + softirq += kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[SOFTIRQ];
>> + steal += kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[STEAL];
>> + guest += kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[GUEST];
>> + guest_nice += kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[GUEST_NICE];
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j< NR_SOFTIRQS; j++) {
>> + unsigned int softirq_stat = kstat_softirqs_cpu(j, i);
>> +
>> + per_softirq_sums[j] += softirq_stat;
>> + sum_softirq += softirq_stat;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + sum += arch_irq_stat();
>> +
>> + seq_printf(p, "cpu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu "
>> + "%llu\n",
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(user),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(nice),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(system),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(idle),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(iowait),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(irq),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(steal),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
>> + for_each_online_cpu(i) {
>> + /* Copy values here to work around gcc-2.95.3, gcc-2.96 */
>
> GCC 3.2 is the listed current minimum requirement. If this code is being
> revisited this could be cleaned up.
>
>> + user = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[USER];
>> + nice = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[NICE];
>> + system = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[SYSTEM];
>> + idle = get_idle_time(i);
>> + iowait = get_iowait_time(i);
>> + irq = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[IRQ];
>> + softirq = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[SOFTIRQ];
>> + steal = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[STEAL];
>> + guest = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[GUEST];
>> + guest_nice = kstat_cpu(i).cpustat[GUEST_NICE];
>> + seq_printf(p,
>> + "cpu%d %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu %llu "
>> + "%llu\n",
>> + i,
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(user),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(nice),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(system),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(idle),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(iowait),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(irq),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(softirq),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(steal),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest),
>> + (unsigned long long)cputime64_to_clock_t(guest_nice));
>> + }
>> + seq_printf(p, "intr %llu", (unsigned long long)sum);
>> +
>> + /* sum again ? it could be updated? */
>> + for_each_irq_nr(j)
>> + seq_printf(p, " %u", kstat_irqs(j));
>> +
>> + seq_printf(p,
>> + "\nctxt %llu\n"
>> + "btime %lu\n"
>> + "processes %lu\n"
>> + "procs_running %lu\n"
>> + "procs_blocked %lu\n",
>> + nr_context_switches(),
>> + (unsigned long)jif,
>> + total_forks,
>> + nr_running(),
>> + nr_iowait());
>> +
>> + seq_printf(p, "softirq %llu", (unsigned long long)sum_softirq);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i< NR_SOFTIRQS; i++)
>> + seq_printf(p, " %u", per_softirq_sums[i]);
>> + seq_putc(p, '\n');
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> #ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_CPUACCT
>>
>> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists