[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29dbe1d4d0e92bc4b4acf1ac2909f2df.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 05:04:26 -0800 (PST)
From: merez@...eaurora.org
To: "Seungwon Jeon" <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
Cc: "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@...com>, merez@...eaurora.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, "Chris Ball" <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
kgene.kim@...sung.com, dh.han@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5
device
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Maya Erez wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 Maya Erez wrote:
>>>> > S, Venkatraman <svenkatr@...com> wrote:
>>>> >> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Seungwon Jeon
>>>> <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >> >> > +static u8 mmc_blk_chk_packable(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct
>>>> >> request *req)
>>>>
>>>> The function prepares the checkable list and not only checks if
>>>> packing
>>>> is
>>>> possible, therefore I think its name should change to reflect its real
>>>> action
>>> I labored at naming. Isn't it proper? :)
>>> Do you have any recommendation?
>>> group_pack_req?
>>>
How about mmc_blk_prep_packed_list?
Thanks,
Maya Erez
Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists