[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABPqkBTJU5PWpLq3en3sECiAK2AvgLoR+AVqRoZmfNpp_bM_Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 18:39:29 +0100
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"ming.m.lin@...el.com" <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf_events: fix and improve x86 event scheduling
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:00 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 15:26 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> There is an edge from the source to all the events.
>> There is an edge from all the counters to the sync.
>> There is an edge between an event and a counter, if
>> it can count the event.
>>
>> The capacity of any edge is 1.
>
> Ah indeed.
>
> So that gives:
>
> E = e+e*c+c ~= O(c^2); since e<=c
> V = 2+e+c ~= O(c)
>
> Then going by:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maximum_flow_problem
>
> we have to stay away from Edmonds-Karp.
>
> Ford-Fulkerson would end up being O(E * c) = O(c^3), since max |f| is c.
> Which is pretty much identical to all these O(V^2 E) = O(c^3) as well.
>
> Dinitz blocking flow with dynamic trees looks more interesting at O(c^2
> log(c)). Push relabel with dynamic trees looks to be best at O(c^2),
> since V^2/E ends up being c^2/c^2 = 1.
>
> Creating the graph itself will be O(c^2) as well, due to E.
>
I think we are in the special case of a bi-partite graph with unit capacities,
thus the complexity can be reduced even more.
See Special Cases in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dinic%27s_algorithm
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists