[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111114215455.GA16018@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 13:54:55 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Andrew Worsley <amworsley@...il.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Uwe Bonnes <bon@...ktron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>,
Johan Hovold <jhovold@...il.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix Corruption issue in USB ftdi driver
drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio.c
On Thu, Nov 03, 2011 at 04:06:31PM +1100, Andrew Worsley wrote:
> Avoid unnecessary Control URBs that reset the data/parity or baud rate
> to the currently set settings which can cause the FTDI chip to glitch
> it's serial output and cause a corruption of a character it is
> currently outputting.
>
> Signed-off-by: amworsley@...il.com
>
> ---
>
> ....
> > It shouldn't be unless the apps you are running are doing odd things.
> > I'd not expect parity to keep changing certainly. What may be occuring
> > is that some of these devices only handle RTS/CTS flow and force the
> > flag on, indicating it back to the app. If the app ignores that then it
> > may end up trying to clear it several times.
>
> Okay - Thanks I will try stracing the process and see if it is issuing
> all the requests. I thought
> it might be the line discipline trying to flow control the input. I've
> lost my box for the moment so that
> will be tomorrow perhaps.
>
> ....
>
> >> +
> >> /* NOTE These routines can get interrupted by
> >> ftdi_sio_read_bulk_callback - need to examine what this
> >> means - don't see any problems yet */
> >>
> >> + if ((old_termios->c_cflag & (CSIZE|PARODD|CSTOPB|PARODD)) ==
> >> + (termios->c_cflag & (CSIZE|PARODD|CSTOPB|PARODD)))
> >
> > I think you need
> >
> > CSIZE (for CS7/8 switch)
> > PARODD (parity odd/even)
> > CMSPAR (parity mark/space v odd/even)
> > CSTOPB (stop bits)
> >
> > while you have PARODD twice.
> >
> > Otherwise this looks correct.
>
>
> Woops - yep that was wrong. I attach a new patch - with CMSPAR and
> PARENB which I assume is also parity related.
Much better, thanks, but the tabs all seem to have been removed from
this patch, making it impossible to apply.
Also, I need a "clean" patch, against the 3.1 tree at the least, in
order to be able to apply this, not against a previous version of your
patch.
Also, run your patch through the scripts/checkpatch.pl script to ensure
it is correct before sending it out.
Care to fix this up and resend so that I can apply this?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists