linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] input: add driver support for Sharp gp2ap002a00f proximity sensor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111115084758.GF6492@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:47:59 +0200
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, oskar.andero@...yericsson.com,
	"linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jic23@....ac.uk" <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	"aghayal@...eaurora.org" <aghayal@...eaurora.org>,
	"Cavin, Courtney" <Courtney.Cavin@...yericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] input: add driver support for Sharp gp2ap002a00f
 proximity sensor

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:09AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:29:26AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > > > > +	error = input_register_device(dt->device);
> > > > > > +	if (error) {
> > > > > > +		dev_err(&dt->device->dev, "device registration failed\n");
> > > > > > +		input_free_device(dt->device);
> > > > > 
> > > > > If you swap request_threaded_irq() and input_register_device() so that
> > > > > registration is the last action error handling will be much simpler.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > I am getting a bit confused here, since you asked me to swap the order
> > > > of request_threaded_irq() and input_register_device() in my previous
> > > > version as well. Swapping again will take us back to square one or maybe
> > > > I am misinterpreting your comment?
> > > 
> > > Gah, sorry, a bit of boilerplate slipped in. You already have the calls
> > > in right order, you just need proper labels.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 	input_dev = input_allocate_device();
> > > 	if (!input_dev) {
> > > 		dev_err(...);
> > > 		error = -ENOMEM;
> > > 		goto err_free_mem;
> > > 	}
> > > 
> > > 	... set up input device fully ...
> > > 
> > > 	error = request_threaded_irq(...);
> > > 	if (error) {
> > > 		dev_err(...);
> > > 		goto err_free_input_dev;
> > > 	}
> > > 
> > > 	error = input_register_device(input_dev);
> > > 	if (error) {
> > > 		dev_err(...);
> > > 		goto err_free_irq;
> > > 	}
> > 
> > are you sure this is right order ? Won't this create a very small
> > timeframe where we could try to call input_report_switch() and
> > input_sync() on an unregistered input device ??
> > 
> 
> Yes, this is fine. As long as input device was allocated with
> input_allocate_device() it can be used by input_report_*() and
> input_sync() even tough device may not be registered yet - the events
> will simply be dropped.

good to know, thanks :-)

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)