linux-kernel - Re: ARCH_PXA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111115102803.GC23376@infomag.iguana.be>
Date:	Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:28:03 +0100
From:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>
Cc:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ux.intel.com>,
	Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ARCH_PXA_ADX

Hi All,

> > 2) So it seems these two drivers could never have been built from the
> > mainline tree. (I'm starting to think that the config tools should
> > somehow check stuff like this.)
> > 
> > 3) Is the above correct? If it is, why shouldn't I submit the trivial
> > patch to remove both these drivers?
> 
> Yes, all of that is correct. Unfortunately, I never got around to mainlining
> the rest of the code. Feel free to remove both drivers and add my Acked-by.

I will remove the watchdog driver out of my trees and sent it to Linus.

Kind regards,
Wim.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/