[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC2509D.30604@parallels.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:44:29 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Routine for generating an safe ID for kernel pointer
>> +unsigned long gen_object_id(void *ptr)
>> +{
>> + if (!ptr)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (unlikely(!ptr_poison)) {
>> + spin_lock(&ptr_poison_lock);
>> + if (!ptr_poison)
>> + get_random_bytes(&ptr_poison, sizeof(ptr_poison));
>> + spin_unlock(&ptr_poison_lock);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return ((unsigned long)ptr) ^ ptr_poison;
>> +}
>
> You could put this in mm/util.c. Wouldn't it make sense to separate
> the initialization and use late_initcall() to call it?
OK, will put to util.c
About the initialization - I will put the sanity check about poison being not 0 on
get_object_id() anyway, so what's the point in separate initialization?
> Pekka
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists