[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC2D8AA.6080701@xenotime.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:24:58 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
CC: linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: Fix minor typos in pinctrl.txt
On 11/14/2011 09:36 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Fix some minor typos in the pinctrl documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
> ---
> Documentation/pinctrl.txt | 16 ++++++++--------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
> index b04cb7d..c849a09 100644
> --- a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int __init foo_probe(void)
> Pins usually have fancier names than this. You can find these in the dataheet
fix typo: datasheet
> for your chip. Notice that the core pinctrl.h file provides a fancy macro
> called PINCTRL_PIN() to create the struct entries. As you can see I enumerated
> -the pins from 0 in the upper left corner to 63 in the lower right corner,
> +the pins from 0 in the lower left corner to 63 in the upper right corner,
fix run-on sentences:
the pins from 0 in the lower left corner to 63 in the upper right corner.
This enumeration was arbitrarily chosen; in practice you need to think
> this enumeration was arbitrarily chosen, in practice you need to think
> through your numbering system so that it matches the layout of registers
> and such things in your driver, or the code may become complicated. You must
--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists