[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111115045404.GC30247@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 20:54:04 -0800
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: cody <mail.kai.huang@...il.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel-iommu: Default to non-coherent for domains
unattached to iommus
* cody (mail.kai.huang@...il.com) wrote:
> On 11/11/2011 05:20 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 17:08 -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
> >>On a slightly separate, but performance related note...have you ever
> >>tried using the hw queue? Currently we only have a sw queue, but the
> >>submission path for invalidations doesn't really queue (unless I missed
> >>it). It seems to pull from the software queue and submit/wait,
> >>submit/wait...Seems simple enough to submit the whole queue and then
> >>issue the wait.
> >I have a feeling we trigger errata if we do that — although if we're
> >only doing it for an emulated IOMMU that shouldn't be an issue.
> >
> What does the emulated IOMMU here? Does it mean the emulated IOMMU
> exposed to guest VM?
Yes. So for KVM, the IOMMU emulation would be in QEMU.
thanks,
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists