[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1321433782.1421.71.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:56:22 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Salman Qazi <sqazi@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: avoid unnecessary overflow in sched_clock
On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 23:08 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> Probably a good idea -- This especially sucks rocks in the sched_clock_stable==1
> case; resulting in it coming straight back out of sched_clock_cpu() and trashing
> rq->clock.
There's another problem there in that TSC will wrap too soon and things
will blow up in your face that way.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists