linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: add the inline keyword to the prototype.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1321434038.1421.73.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:00:38 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc:	Il Han <corone.il.han@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: add the inline keyword to the prototype.

On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 23:28 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> On 11/15/2011 10:16 AM, Il Han wrote:
> > The prototype has to agree with the definition.
> > Add the inline keyword to the prototype also
> >
> 
> Hmm... this would then cause the prototypes to disagree in the 
> !CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH case.

I'm very sure I've compiled a lot of kernels yesterday with various
permutations including FAIR_GROUP && !CFS_BANDWIDTH and I'm also very
sure I haven't actually seen any complaints like this.

It this some new fangled GCC 'feature'? I'm currently still on 4.5 which
admittedly is somewhat stale.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/