linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -rt] memcg: use migrate_disable()/migrate_enable( ) in memcg_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1321452758.4181.18.camel@frodo>
Date:	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 09:12:38 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rt] memcg: use migrate_disable()/migrate_enable( ) in
 memcg_check_events()

On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 17:16 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> Looking at commit 4799401f [memcg: Fix race condition in
> memcg_check_events() with this_cpu usage], we just want
> to disable migration. So use the right API in -rt. This
> will cure below warning.
> 

>  mm/memcontrol.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 6aff93c..afa1954 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_target_update(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int target)
>   */
>  static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
>  {
> -	preempt_disable();
> +	migrate_disable();

No this won't work. Not even for -rt. If we disable migration but not
preemption, then two tasks can take this path. And the checks in
__memcg_event_check() will be corrupted because nothing is protecting
the updates from two tasks going into the same path.

Perhaps a local_lock would work.

-- Steve

>  	/* threshold event is triggered in finer grain than soft limit */
>  	if (unlikely(__memcg_event_check(memcg, MEM_CGROUP_TARGET_THRESH))) {
>  		mem_cgroup_threshold(memcg);
> @@ -742,7 +742,7 @@ static void memcg_check_events(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct page *page)
>  		}
>  #endif
>  	}
> -	preempt_enable();
> +	migrate_enable();
>  }
>  
>  static struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_cont(struct cgroup *cont)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/