linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:26:48 -0500
From:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:14:04PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:29:52AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Bruce,
> > 
> > After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:4446:5: error: expected ';', ',' or ')' before 'void'
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c: In function 'nfsd_forget_locks':
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:4468:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'nfsd_release_n_owners' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > 
> > Caused by commit 16bfdaafa2c6 ("nfsd4: share open and lock owner hash
> > tables").  Please build test *before* releasing code ...  :-(
> 
> I do--so what happened?
> 
> Aie, sorry, I see: we added a CONFIG_NFSD_FAULT_INJECTION recently, but
> I didn't add that to my configs....
> 
> OK, I've fixed up my test scripts, and I'll push out a fix soon.

Done, thanks for the report.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/