[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC3EFB3.9080205@metafoo.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:15:31 +0100
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Dimitris Papastamos <dp@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org, drivers@...log.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] regmap: Check if a register is writable instead of
readable in regcache_read
On 11/16/2011 06:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 06:09:06PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 11/16/2011 05:56 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> No, really - just do something legible and robust. For example, teach
>>> regmap_readable() about the cache.
>
>> Doesn't make much sense. We call regmap_readable from regcache_read, which
>> is only called if we use a cache. So if we let regmap_readable return true
>> in case we use a cache it will always be true in regcache_read and we can
>> drop the check entirely.
>
> We should at least check that we actually have a cached value there -
> the cache is sparse after all.
That's what the cache already does today, you recently change the rbtree
implementation to return -ENOENT if there is no cached value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists