[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111116172347.GC5847@una0919255>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:23:50 +0100
From: Patrick Combes <p-combes@...com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Hugo Dupras <h-dupras@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] gpiolib: add irq_wake (power-management) sysfs
file
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 02:37:31PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 03:30:13PM +0100, Patrick Combes wrote:
>
> > > ...this doesn't do anything to stop userspace doing multiple enables and
> > > disables.
>
> > Do you mean there is a need to prevent that?
> > Basically the code above accepts both "1" or "enable" strings to enable the
> > property. I could limit that to "enable" / "disable" if it is confusing.
>
> That's not the problem. The problem is that if you disable it might not
> actually disable the wake if it's previously been enabled multiple times.
You're right; I however wonder if this API should work as 'enable_irq_wake' or
if it should filter multiple enables/disables. I'd have supposed it's a choice
of implementation but based on your comment I understand filtering is the
expected way. I'll modify the function accordingly. Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists