[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1321485715.12374.56.camel@nimitz>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:21:55 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@...ttering.net>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] tmpfs: add fallocate support
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 15:21 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> 于 2011年11月16日 01:43, Dave Hansen 写道:
> > On Tue, 2011-11-15 at 18:23 +0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> >>> + if (!(mode& FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE)) {
> >>> + ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, (offset + len));
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + return ret;
> >>> + }
> >
> > inode_newsize_ok()'s comments say:
> >
> > * inode_newsize_ok must be called with i_mutex held.
> >
> > But I don't see any trace of it.
>
> Hmm, even for tmpfs? I see none of the tmpfs code takes
> i_mutex lock though...
Look harder. :)
ramfs/tmpfs for a large part just used the generic VFS functions to do
their work since they're page-cache based. For instance:
static const struct file_operations shmem_file_operations = {
...
.aio_write = generic_file_aio_write,
IOW, you need to check beyond mm/shmem.c.
-- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists