[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87aa7xos3n.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:28:52 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
avi@...hat.com, penberg@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 RFC] virtio-spec: flexible configuration layout
On Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:39:13 +0200, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 6:24 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> > (2) There's no huge win in keeping the same layout. Let's make some
> > cleanups. There are more users ahead of us then behind us (I
> > hope!).
>
> Actually, if we already do cleanups, here are two more suggestions:
>
> 1. Make 64bit features a one big 64bit block, instead of having 32bits
> in one place and 32 in another.
> 2. Remove the reserved fields out of the config (the ones that were
> caused by moving the ISR and the notifications out).
Yes, those were exactly what I was thinking. I left it vague because
there might be others you can see if we're prepared to abandon the
current format.
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists