linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Iterate over u300_pmx_mask's in u300_pmx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdaK6vFqfZ7_ccizunqqD+8KqBG8vkzRG5mszMxmtwjeDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:01:06 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
Cc:	linus.walleij@...ricsson.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: Iterate over u300_pmx_mask's in u300_pmx_endisable

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com> wrote:

> Fix u300_pmx_endisable() to iterate over the list of 'bits' and
> 'mask' populated as part of u300_pmx_functions.mask[]
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
> ---
> Linus W,
> I am not sure if this is a right fix. I just stumbled
> upon this while looking at the u300 pinmux driver
> while I was writing one for OMAP. Maybe I am reading
> the code completely wrong, and I don't even have a
> way to test this, so its just compile tested with
> u300_defconfig.

Looks correct and works, I've just been saved by the fact that
most mux settings are in a good default mode when powering
on the system.

Thanks, applied!
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/