[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1321519709.27735.13.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:48:29 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] lockdep,rtmutex,bug: Show taint flags on error
On Wed, 2011-11-16 at 21:52 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 04:36:55AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Currently lock debugging is disabled when the kernel is tainted, with
> > a few exceptions. It is already recognised that this can be useful
> > for staging modules (TAINT_CRAP), but that also goes for out-of-tree
> > modules (TAINT_OOT_MODULE) so long as core kernel developers don't
> > have to spend time debugging them. Also, there are several reasons
> > for tainting that are unlikely to introduce false locking bug reports
> > (e.g. TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND).
> > Instead of disabling lock debugging, show the taint flags in all
> > lockdep and rtmutex-debug error messages.
So this is two patches in one. I took the last part, the printing of the
taint flags thing, not the first part.
I did a small patch adding TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND to the list of
TAINTS that shouldn't disable lockdep.
As for OOT_MODULE, with staging the only reason not to merge a module is
it being the wrong license and I really can't be arsed about OOT stuff
anyway, so no.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists