[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC520AE.3070409@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 06:56:46 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: wangyanqing <Udknight@...il.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
castet.matthieu@...e.fr, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, x86@...nel.org,
spock@...too.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: remove NX from video bios area
On 11/17/2011 12:26 AM, wangyanqing wrote:
>
> +/*we hope this the right video bios range*/
> +#define VIDEO_BIOS_BEGIN 0x000c0000
> +#define VIDEO_BIOS_END 0x000c7fff
> +
> #define BIOS_ROM_BASE 0xffe00000
> #define BIOS_ROM_END 0xffffffff
Ick. This feels increasingly hacky, especially since the above is known
to not be the video BIOS range on a lot of reasons.
There is something much more fundamentally wrong here, including why X
permission is needed for uvesafb at all.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists