[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC53E72.5040408@inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:03:46 +0100
From: Tomasz Buchert <tomasz.buchert@...ia.fr>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup_freezer: fix freezing groups with stopped tasks
Le 17/11/2011 17:13, Michal Hocko a écrit :
> On Thu 17-11-11 11:14:53, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I'm trying to understand now why I did that change in
>>
>> 2d3cbf8bc (the bug itself was in the if-the-else clause in
>> update_if_frozen , anyway).
>> Well, when I look at this now I think that there is nothing wrong
>> with your patch.
>> You can try my testcases from 2d3cbf8bc and 0bdba580, but it should be ok.
> Yes, I have tried it before sending the patch.
>
>> One thing I am not sure completely of is the following situation. So
>> the group is frozen
>> with the STOPPED task inside. There are few questions:
>> * if you send SIGCONT to the task now, will it wake up?
> No, it will enter refrigerator and wake up on thawing the group. Check
> out `goto relock' after do_signal_stop returns.
>
I've checked your patch empirically few hours before :).
Also I've read get_signal_to_deliver() and you are right - it's gonna be
fine.
The decision is not mine, of course, but I suggest to merge it.
Good work!
Tomek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists