[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1321560192.11312.2.camel@Joe-Laptop>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:03:12 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@...ra2net.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix comparison using wrong pointer variable in dma
debug code
On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 20:31 +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote:
> cppcheck reported:
> [lib/dma-debug.c:248] -> [lib/dma-debug.c:248]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '=='.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@...ra2net.com>
> ---
> lib/dma-debug.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/dma-debug.c b/lib/dma-debug.c
> index 74c6c7f..fea790a 100644
> --- a/lib/dma-debug.c
> +++ b/lib/dma-debug.c
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static void put_hash_bucket(struct hash_bucket *bucket,
>
> static bool exact_match(struct dma_debug_entry *a, struct dma_debug_entry *b)
> {
> - return ((a->dev_addr == a->dev_addr) &&
> + return ((a->dev_addr == b->dev_addr) &&
> (a->dev == b->dev)) ? true : false;
> }
>
Perhaps more sensible without the unnecessary ?:
return a->dev_addr == b->dev_addr && a->dev == b->dev;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists