[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111117142213.2b34469d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:22:13 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.2-rc3] cpusets: stall when updating mems_allowed
for mempolicy or disjoint nodemask
On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 13:08:33 -0800 (PST)
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> c0ff7453bb5c ("cpuset,mm: fix no node to alloc memory when changing
> cpuset's mems") adds get_mems_allowed() to prevent the set of allowed
> nodes from changing for a thread. This causes any update to a set of
> allowed nodes to stall until put_mems_allowed() is called.
>
> This stall is unncessary, however, if at least one node remains unchanged
> in the update to the set of allowed nodes. This was addressed by
> 89e8a244b97e ("cpusets: avoid looping when storing to mems_allowed if one
> node remains set"), but it's still possible that an empty nodemask may be
> read from a mempolicy because the old nodemask may be remapped to the new
> nodemask during rebind. To prevent this, only avoid the stall if there
> is no mempolicy for the thread being changed.
>
> This is a temporary solution until all reads from mempolicy nodemasks can
> be guaranteed to not be empty without the get_mems_allowed()
> synchronization.
>
> Also moves the check for nodemask intersection inside task_lock() so that
> tsk->mems_allowed cannot change.
The patch doesn't actually apply, due to changes made by your earlier
89e8a244b97e ("cpusets: avoid looping when storing to mems_allowed if
one node remains set"). Please recheck/redo/resend/etc?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists