[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC61DB1.3090608@mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:56:17 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
CC: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] hugetlb: Provide safer dummy values for HPAGE_MASK
and HPAGE_SIZE
Hello.
On 18-11-2011 1:57, David Daney wrote:
> From: David Daney<david.daney@...ium.com>
> It was pointed out by David Rientjes that the dummy values for
> HPAGE_MASK and HPAGE_SIZE are quite unsafe. It they are inadvertently
> used with !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE, compilation would succeed, but the
> resulting code would surly not do anything sensible.
>
> Place BUG() in the these dummy definitions, as we do in similar
> circumstances in other places, so any abuse can be easily detected.
>
> Since the only sane place to use these symbols when
> !CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE is on dead code paths, the BUG() cause any actual
> code to be emitted by the compiler.
You mean "doesn't cause"?
> Cc: David Rientjes<rientjes@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney<david.daney@...ium.com>
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists