[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111118110100.1cedc784.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:01:00 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] printk: Don't emit console_cpu_notify() for
CPU_DYING
On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 10:19:24 +0800
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com> wrote:
> When running -rt, I got some warning when doing cpu hotplug,
> for details please check:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=132143661616297&w=2
>
> But seems the problem also exists in mainline, a typical
> scenario is:
>
> CPU A CPU B
>
> doing printk with console_sem held
> take_cpu_down();
> cpu_notify(CPU_DYING);
> console_cpu_notify();
> console_lock();
> down(&console_sem);
> *BANG*
> up(&console_sem);
This doesn't describe a deadlock. For a deadlock to occur, something
must prevent CPU A from proceeding to the up().
Are you able to more fully describe this? I'm suspecting that CPU A
got shut down by CPU B? If so, shutting down a CPU while it holds
locks seems rather bad. Or perhaps it's something else...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists